Sunday, December 18, 2011

Ode to You, ASU - NLM 160!





Dear Students of NLM 160 Voluntary Action and Community Leadership:


FINALS ARE GRADED.  I left comments about your individual exams in the Bb gradebook.

I'm very proud of this class.  There were 13 perfect 100 point exams! If we were together, I'd make you give a standing ovation to these students.

The graph above shows the spread of your scores. Although there are a couple of very low scores, you will see that they are quite skewed toward the high end of the scale.  Only seven of you earned less than a B.  


Some might say, "Well duh, you gave us the exact selection of text where we could "look" for the answers." Well, yes I did list the readings I wanted you to refer to for each question.  However, that's not really what we're seeing. 


By asking you to find an organization online and apply the information in the readings to that organization's situation, you demonstrate that you can use the information in a real life situation.  I want to know whether you can apply what you've learned, not whether you can memorize and spit information back to me.


If you can't take what you learned in class and apply it, then I've only done half my job. 

The amount of work involved in reading 60 exams is well worth the trouble, because it gives me an opportunity to see exactly what you've learned this semester and what didn't work. Here are the two biggest mistakes, both of which I consider minor because they are definitional, not substantive:

(1) About two-thirds of you wrongly identified an organization as fitting the community building model. There were two common mistakes, (a) the organization fit the civic model but worked inside a geographically bound location, or (b) the organization were "support" organizations for community building organizations, but were not, themselves, community building organizations. 

(3) About a third of you do not realize that "framing" means the way we craft language - rather than tactics - to create powerful messages that express an ideology (Lakoff). 

NOW, HERE IS WHAT IS BRILLIANT ABOUT YOU

The beauty of this exam was that I got to see that you are capable of figuring out what these organizations were doing right, and what wasn't working for them.  You were able to identify the assets they bring to their endeavors, and suggest other resources that might improve their work.  You had thoughtful suggestions about better strategies to further their causes.   


You noticed where their framing was successfully pulling others into their work, and where their framing was frightening potential allies away.  


You were able to trouble-shoot, innovate, and suggest ways that very diverse organizations could work together. I marveled over and over again at your brilliant solutions for thinking about how diametrically opposed organizations could find a way to come together. 


A couple of you rose to challenges like joining Westboro Baptist Church or Pro-Life organizations with LGBT groups, or "out there" protest groups like PETA or Rolling Thunder with quiet cultural centers or youth education organizations! Do you realize that if you employ these skills in real life, you will bridge gaps that have stymied older generations? 

One of the most impressive things you showed me was that you know that if two groups are not ready to work together, there are still preliminary places they can meet and engage. They can pair off for conversation and get to know each other as individuals. They can convene to simply tell their stories, without any future obligation at all. There is always a starting point for trust-building.  

I don't believe in grading on a curve. I believe in making sure you walk out of my class with solid knowledge. You guys did a marvelous job and should pat yourselves on the back. 

Oh yeah, and my other favorite thing about this exam: Those who skated without reading the assignments during the semester have surely read them by now. No getting these excellent grades without reading the material! 

You were a great class. I learned as much from you as you did from me! 

Enjoy your holiday break, and when you do really amazing things in your future, which I know you all will, please let me know about it!

Warmly,

Sandy Price

Friday, December 9, 2011

So Many Fishies, So Little Time



"One guy could be the driest man in the universe, giving practical birthday gifts - think paying for a window washer so I don't have to get out the ladder.  The other guy could take me to the moon, turn life into something beautifully, romantically surreal. Of course, he might be poor as a dog, spending all that time writing poetry."  




In a world where most people are paired by my age, and I don't meet that many single Jewish guys in the course of my normal day, I have found a place on the online dating sites.  One such site, Plenty of Fish, has as many Jewish guys as JDate, and because the service is free, why not?  That also means I am approached by non-Jewish guys in about the proportion that non-Jews are represented in the overall population.  The interaction on these sites can be so amusing, such a study of human thought and longing, that friends have urged me to save the responses I get and write.  I've never wanted to do that until today.  Today I got two such diametrically opposed letters that I couldn't help but share.


So, to begin, I actually got more than two letters.  This morning was typical.  I received several emails - maybe eight or ten.  The majority of them started and finished with something like, "You're beautiful [hot, pretty, sexy, just what I'm looking for, etc].  When can we meet?"  This is flattering, but it is also indicative that the fellow is flipping through profiles looking for someone he can sleep with without putting a bag over her head.  If I'm up to testing this theory, I can simply check his profile, and "yup, he's not Jewish."  That is a sure signal that he didn't read my profile, in which I have three paragraphs of explanation about why - I mean it - I am only dating Jewish men.  I don't even respond to these bag men.  There are simply too many.  


What, you ask, if he's a Jewish bag man?  LOL.  I wish.  


To be fair here, we are all animals and physical attraction is worth something.  The few times I've been tempted to break my own rule about dating Jewish guys, it's because I have a strong physical attraction to someone's picture, then read into the profile and see that they're interesting too.  I have to fight those urges down, so I get it.


There's a more intelligent variation on the above tactic.  These guys say, "I loved your profile.  Check mine and tell me if you're interested."  While it purports to be interested in what I wrote, it's a no-brainer that he's secretly interested in the photo.  You can tell because he doesn't mention a single thing I actually wrote about myself.   Again, I can check my theory, and as soon as I read something like, "Good Christian, loves Jesus," or just plain "Episcopalian" in the Religion box, I am confirmed. 


Today, for example, I got a note from one Javier that said this, "You have a very sincere and open profile.  Really tells alot about yourself.  My name is Javier and I would like to get to know you better and hopefully go out and have dinner."  Javier, it turns out, is Catholic - and 32 years old.


I usually answer these, because it humors me to be honest, with something like, "You didn't really read my profile, did you?  LOL."  


I hope the "LOL" tells them that I get that he's being, as Bill Engval would say, "just a guy."  I'm not really being too snarky.  


Sometimes they come back with, "Well, you're right, I didn't read your profile, and now that I have, I apologize.  I'm not Jewish and I wish you well."  Answer:  "Thank you."


Other times they come back with, "You are limiting yourself.  You don't know where love will show up.  Please reconsider."  Answer:  "We all limit ourselves.  Some won't date someone with an opposing political view.  Others limit by body type. If you were attracted to me, I bet you passed right by all those well-rounded mamas you saw.  I have a few rounder girlfriends, and you know what, they're every bit as interesting, loving, sexual - as I am.  You're really limiting yourself."  


But my favorite is, "I didn't realize you were a prejudiced bitch.  Glad I don't have to meet you."  Answer:  [none].  Or, occasionally, if they didn't call me a bitch - just prejudiced - I tell them that my first husband wasn't Jewish, and that, although we used the same words, our underlying value system was different.  That I want someone who shares my nostalgia for my holidays and rituals.  But mostly, why talk to a wall?


Not to mention, the old saying, "Yes means yes, maybe means yes, and no means maybe to a man."  If I even continue the conversation, I'm apparently letting the man know that I'm open to talk - and hence reconsider.  So, I don't respond more often than a polite Kansas girl thinks in her heart is correct.


But getting back to my typical day.  I got two very interesting emails this morning, in that they are very different.  I don't usually write about this stuff, but these two approaches were so distinct, that they warranted a blog post.  The first writer is obviously a left-brained fella, and he's using reason and evidence to convince me that I'm lucky to have his attention.  The bottom line:  "There aren't that many men in the barrel, and if one comes along, I should grab him up."  I should tell you that this man has been pursuing me for months, AND is Jewish, and I've turned him down repeatedly on the grounds that he's ten years younger than I am.  I will date someone 5 or 6 years on either side, but I confess to a bit of insecurity about what happens when my looks take their last breath, and the man in my bed wakes up one morning to find Granny Clampet laying next to him.  Is he out the door, or does "In sickness and in health, in beauty and in decline..." mean anything to him?  Will we have enough money to keep me in botox?   


I experienced this fear, whether or not irrational, when I dated a man 9 years my junior for three years.  He was fine with it, but his friends were his age, and their wives and girlfriends were 15 years younger than I.  I have always been satisfied with myself.  I don't see myself as a great beauty - more like the girl next door.  Very happy with that.  I've learned over time that I'm not for some men, and others will like how I look very much.  But hanging around women who are 15 years younger than you can be intimidating.  You immediately start realizing all the ways you're aging.  Your skin texture is different.  They can still eat everything under the sun without effect.  Their thighs haven't started leaning on their knee caps yet.  Whatever it all is, it's like having the fact that you age - yes, I know it's inevitable - thrown into your face.  Nobody likes to look aging in the face.  


Anyway, the first writer is 10 years my junior.  Otherwise I'm sure we would have met by now.  Here's his latest argument - and as a teacher, I do have to credit him for doing his research! 


"There are 80 men for every 100 woman in the United States. Over age 40 that number becomes about 77 men to every 100 women.


30 % of the population in Arizona is considered Obese  47% of the population is considered overweight.

The number off single men over 35 as compared to single women is 2 women to every guy 2-1 which means if a guys is attractive enough for you there is at least 1 other person he could be dating. 10% of the population is unemployeed. 70 % of the men over 40 have been married at least once and have children. Which means the odds of finding a single in shape man over 40 with a job no kids is 1 out of five. Which make me feel very good about me.. Oh due to the current mortgage crissis a home owner you don't want to know..I feel even better. 

46 of the adult population is not married using the ratio 100 million unmarried males and females.

The median male income in Arizona was 33000.00 per year. So a single guy who makes 3-5 times that a year and is not married well let's just say it's about 1 in 22. I believe ever one deserves the best it's just how we define it."  




It's hard to argue with him by these statistics.  He's a catch!  And age difference or no, I should realize my good luck.  He's persistent too.  I'll give him that.


The second writer, obviously, has either been schooled in how to appeal to the romantic side of a woman, or is a romantic himself.  You never really know.  But he wrote a poem. Or he lifted someone else's poem without crediting the author.   But you have to give him credit, whether he wrote it or lifted it, for choosing it.  I assume he did not write this poem for me personally, and that he uses it with any woman he approaches. 


"i want to touch you... yes your flesh 
but more than this i want to handle 
bright glorious fabric of your soul 
with gentle hands of my heart 
let it slide though fingers 
of patient understanding 
like colorful fine silk 
leaving behind it 
indelible sense 
of your true 
uniqueness 
i want to know you, every part of you 
all your heights of obstinate courage 
and darkest depths of fervent fear 
each wild fantasy you entertain 
and gloomy reality you face 
i want to hold you close 
and kiss you so deeply 
soul to soul with lips 
flaming imagination 
on fire with desire 
for me alone"



One of these guys could be a rock.  Stable and realistic and there for you when you need someone to be there for you.  The other guy could spend his days in flights of fancy, his feet never really touching the earth.  Or one guy could be the driest man in the universe, giving practical birthday gifts - think paying for a window washer so I don't have to get out the ladder.  The other guy could take me to the moon, turn life into something beautifully, romantically surreal. Of course, he might be poor as a dog, spending all that time writing poetry.  Can we eat poetry?


I know there are stories just like this on the other side - the male side - of this gender gap.  I have heard stories about the women who ask you right up front how much money you make, or try to move in after the very first date.  


So, these are the choices we singles get to make every day.  The mating ritual can be so interesting.


Oh, and if you know any nice, intelligent, single Jewish guys between the ages of say, 48 and 58, be so kind as to introduce me!



Monday, September 26, 2011

UPDATE - Is this the Facebook, er, World we want?

Earlier this afternoon, I posted my concerns about the Facebook privacy changes.  They are really confusing, and if we happen to be friended on Facebook, you can read my pal Dan Notov's running commentary as he tries to figure out how to make a completely clean public Fb wall.

Because that's what the wall used to be - completely blank unless you specifically set it to let others see it.  


That's what we suppose it still is unless we go to some special profile edit page and use a button that lets us see what the Public sees when they look at our wall.  I'll ask Dan to come back to the blog and put his findings up when he's figured it all out.

So, knowing this is all in Dan's good hands - he's a computer geek - I decided to do something else.  I have a bunch of open windows - Google Chrome Browser, by the way - and I thought I'd see what I'd parked till after I finished today's grading, and then close them down.

Well, the first thing I noticed is that the ads on every single page were very predictable.  They all, without exception, had the two shoe ads you can see on this blog.  If you know me well, you know I love to be outdoors.  Because of the heat, I prefer sport sandals over any closed shoe, even though, as my friends like to point out to me, I'm more likely to take a pebble than if my foot is closed into a lace-up shoe with socks.  I also narrow down the selection by looking for shoes that have a toe guard, which basically means the sole wraps up in front and creates a bumper for my toes.

As you can see, someone, aka Google, has been taking stock of my preferences, and putting pics of the two pairs of shoes I spent the most time looking at right in front of my face.

No, I did't buy them...yet.  But these photos sure are tempting me.

What's all this have to do with Facebook?  Well, nothing yet.  But I'm wondering just how much more privacy Google+ really provides.  It is a Google network, and John likes it because it is tied into other Google applications.  If Google Chrome tracks me like this, what's to say Google+ doesn't follow me around the web too?  I'll have to see if John will explain all this.

If you have any info, please jump in...

Is this the Facebook we want?

John, one of my good friends, has become paranoid enough about privacy issues on Facebook that he's removing himself (mostly) and transferring his social networking life to Google+.   You know what they say about paranoia.


Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.  

I say "mostly" because John still maintains a silly little private page a few of us have going, and he will be subscribing to his friends without "friending" them.  He sent me a link to a couple of interesting articles written by computer geeks, but clear enough at least for the most part to frighten me too.

The changes on The New Facebook seem to include the ability of Facebook to automatically post every location you're at, every website you visit, etc, without asking you if you'd like to share it.  I don't spend any time on porno sites, but I'd rather not have anyone know how much time I've spent on Amazon.com looking at shoes.

But what really bothers me, if I'm understanding correctly, is that people can now "subscribe" to your wall and see everything on it, whether or not they are friends.  This is completely antithetical to the idea that you can control who sees your wall by specifying only "friends," "friends of friends," etc.  And it appears to be true, because John could subscribe to my wall after he unfriended me.  He could not post, but he could read it.  My settings say "friends of friends," but since he has unfriended all his friends, I shouldn't be showing up for him, even if he's subscribed.  Or so I thought.

The import of this development - that anyone, anyone at all can see everything on my Facebook wall - is troublesome to me.  While I'm trying to decide if  I should wean myself off of Facebook, I thought I'd share the links John sent me.  Parts of them are written in Computer Geek, but if you're not a computer geek, just scroll past that and it becomes English again.

Here's the first one, by Dave Winer, "Facebook is Scaring Me," explains the privacy impacts of the recent Facebook changes.  By the way, when John tried to put the link into a Facebook message, Facebook error messaged me, saying:

Attachment Unavailable
The attachment source was deleted or the privacy settings on this attachment do not allow you to view it.


John, though, is smarter than Facebook, and he got it through!

The second article, "Logging out of Facebook is Not Enough," by Nik Cubrilovic, picks up where Winer left off, explaining the technology and making some suggestions - as I said, scroll past the tech stuff if you're not interested.  There is also a wealth of information in the discussion thread below, including a letter from a Facebook employee explaining some of their practices.  Nik isn't buying much of it, though, and explains why in a follow-up post.

This is fascinating.  I don't think I have much to hide, but then... I'm still job hunting and who knows what information might impact someone's hiring decision.

I'm seriously considering following John's lead and moving to Google+.  The problem there is... it's not intuitive and I think it's going to be difficult figuring out how to use it.  I'm such a wuss.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Bubbl.us?

Tonight I'm trying to figure out some workshop exercises to help thinkers get out of their ruts.  Sometimes using visualization - forcing people into the creative side of their brain - results in the flow of new ideas.

So, using my past employer, The Nature Conservancy, as a model, I hand drew a "community" of people and organizations who care about preserving the ecosystem.  It included cute little cartoonish hunters, hikers, teachers, etc.

My work of art really wasn't that skillfully drawn.  First, I don't have time for that tonight.  Second, I didn't want to scare my attendees away from the project by giving them something to live up to.  But, from my years of experience teaching art, I realized that even my goofy cartoons were going to intimidate some folks.  So, I went off in search of a mapping tool that would quickly let me draw boxes to label, instead of the actual characters.

I found bubbl.us, a free mapping tool.  It's fun.  The address is www.bubbl.us.  Here's the map I made for my workshop.  If I'd had more time tonight, I would have monkeyed with shapes and colors.



Very cool! Try it. It's free.

Friday, June 3, 2011

I'm Sorry. So Sorry.



So today I think I might have but don't really know if I potentially caused a potential disagreement, not even a real one as far as I know yet but I'm still worried about whether I did, between two guy friends. I immediately felt guilty and apologized. And then I apologized again because they didn't accept my apology fast enough so it's probably not enough of an apology.  Then I saw the blog below. 


They're probably both so having a beer together at this very moment.


By blogger Shaheen Raja:  
"New research by psychologists at the University of Waterloo, found women apologize far more than our male counterparts, and we say "we're sorry" to strangers a heckuva lot more than we do to family members. In two studies that measured the frequency and reasoning behind apologies, there was a clear-cut gender gap. "Findings suggest men apologize less frequently than women because they have a higher threshold for what constitutes offensive behavior,"  the Canadian psychologists explained.

So what exactly is this "offensive behavior" women fear they're unleashing on the world?

"I apologize to people on the subway who bump into them, as though I've been offensive to them, simply by taking up space on earth," says Amy, 32.

"I've said sorry to guys I've dated for not acknowledging that they're trying, even if they're trying and failing," says Leah, 27.

Sandra Elmoznino, a 27-year-old teacher tells the Wall Street Journal all she has to do is call a friend too early or arrive somewhere a few minutes late and she's asking forgiveness.  "I want to be in everyone's good graces," she explains. "It's an anxiety thing."

If anxiety stems from lack of control, is it possible women see apologizing as a form of taking back the reins? "For women, apologizing is a way of reconnecting with someone whose feelings you have hurt, however inadvertently," writes psychologist Sam Margulies on his blog at Psychology Today. "A breach in the relationship is avoided and the relationship continues undisturbed. Neither the woman offering nor the woman receiving the apology regard it as unusual but rather see it as a routine aspect of relationships."

For men, it's just the opposite. "Men tend to view apologies as humiliating and a loss of face," suggests Margulies. "Men are more conscious of the impact of what they say on how others perceive their power position or lack of power. So for a man to acknowledge that he has done something wrong often means that he feels diminished in the eyes of those who hear the apology."



PLEASE READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE BY CLICKING HERE.

Source: http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/sex/study-finds-women-apologize-more-than-men-why-2401376/;_ylt=ArP6Arrdh3kCdphHFdTMV5VabqU5
















Sunday, May 29, 2011

Volunteers for America

My friend Ray Jagoda drove down to Joplin from the Kansas City area to help the residents there.  Here's his report and his photos:














"My kids and went to joplin to pass out bottled water to tornado victims as they sifted thru the wreckage to salvage what they could, which was not much.

I will never forget what we saw.
The F5 tornado was like a nuclear
Bomb. I never realized just how
Powerful the weather could be until we saw first hand
What it did in joplin: bark peeled
Off of trees, cars lookedd like they
Had been hit by an ied and then 
Thrown into the middle of a raging
Gun battle. Metal roofing wrapped
Around concrete posts as if it was
Aluminum foil, brick torn off walls
As if it was styrofoam.
And it went on for mile after mile.
Each house with a story. Some tragic
Some miraculous. Of luck, bravery and
Heroism. Many of great loss.
But one thing we couldnt help but notice
Were the thousands of volunteers there helping
With cleanup,food, and their bare hands... From all
Locals, groups and walks of life.
On this memorial day weekend I could say I was
Proud to be an american, but most of all I am
Truly touched and happy to have witnessed such a
Redeeming side of humanity."


pepsi bottling plant




Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Therapy for Life


I'm OK, You're Not.


Those other people aren't the same;
they're different, they must be to blame.
If only they were more like us,
who would we throw beneath the bus?





My brother Mike Gale recently published a book called Of Wisdom and Ignorance and the Fine Line Between Them. 

I want to say it's a poetry book, and it is, but really, it's a book of short, to the point observations about life.  "Wry" would be the word I would use to describe these little gems.  Oh, yes, and they do happen to rhyme.


Here's a few more. 

From the section, "Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder."


My next door neighbor has it all;
Two cars, a boat, a house so tall.
When asked what he thinks of me,
he craves my life's simplicity.

From the section, "Chaos Theory."

Order is so hard to keep;
endless things to fix or sweep.
But as I fix or sweep each day,
The mess in me is swept away.

From the section, "Good Sports"

Why do people love their sports,
silly men in silly shorts?
Weekend warriers think they're bold,
Cause when they stop, they start getting old.














And the poem after which I've titled this post, for its delicious little double entendre:

Your family members you can't choose;
With some you win, with some you lose.
They bring you love, they bring you strife.
They bring you therapy for life.






By the way, you can read them all for a mere $3.58.  Yes, I'm shameless!

Monday, April 11, 2011

To Us and Our Good Fortune


Rose:  The Belle after the Ball

 It's quiet here now.  My parents are tucked away in their big bed.  My Aunt Carol is in my parents' comfortable guest room.  My cousin Michael ("Aunt Carol's Mike") is downstairs on the fold-out couch.  My brother Mike ("our Mike") is folded into the little sofa in my dad's office, and I am parked on the couch in the sitting area off the kitchen.  

There is one more couch - in the living room - if you need a place to sleep tonight.

Over at my cousin Sam's house, Sam's two brothers, Howard and Ethan, Ethan's wife Rona and son Mac are scattered in spare bedrooms and on couches around the house.  Ariella, my 22 year old cousin from Melbourne representing the Australian branch of the family, is also camped over there somewhere, maybe sharing a room with Sam's daughter Imerie. 

From Ariella I learned that Australians do not want to make their own coffee, even from Starbucks beans, even if it could taste exactly like their favorite brew.  The act of leaving the house each morning to pick up the morning coffee is part of a soothing ritual.   

Howard's audacious son Shai and my hip cousin Larry the psychologist are already missed terribly, somewhere in the skies over America, winging their ways homeward.  They should both be landing soon, Shai in Washington, D.C., Larry in Berkeley.  Tomorrow we lose Ethan and clan to Connecticut.  Mike, Michael and Aunt Carol to Seattle, New York and Israel respectively.  Ariella to New York to visit more cousins before heading back down under.

My cousin Stanley and his wife Erica (from St. Louis) went with Stanley's brother Gene and wife Melanie (from Las Vegas) to the graveyard this evening, to visit Stanley and Gene's parents.  They are all still in town until tomorrow.   Next week Stan and Erica will host my daughter for first night of Pesach because she will be in St. Louis for a Wash U reunion (already?).  They promise to get the skinny on the new boyfriend, notwithstanding I feel I already have it.  There is never too much information about a new boyfriend. 

My cousin Lauren and her husband Kenny (they make a really cute couple) are still here somewhere.  Not sure whether they stayed with my Uncle Neil and his wife Gloria, or Lauren's mother, Judy.  They will head back to St. Louis in the a.m.   Unfortunately, I did not adequately connect with Lauren's brother Steven, and I am worried about him.  I will check this with Lauren later.   Oh, and yet more really cool cousins, Matt and Daniel, brothers to another "local," Sarah, all three more of Rose's grandkids. 


And those are just the out-of-towners.  Today we toasted my Great Auntie Rose on her 100th. 

My great Uncle Lou, whose birthday it is also, did not begrudge his big sis her occasion.  He's about sixteen years behind her, after all. 

The social hall at the Shalom Geriatrics Center was overflowing with people, some who have known my aunt for many decades.  Yesterday, sitting around the table at my parents' home, we picked out faces we knew from Auntie Rose's wedding photo.  "There is something about the Goller boys that looks so much like Uncle Sol."  There is my beautiful grandmother Ruth, in her prime, with the man Zayde ultimately forbid her to marry, the immortalization in this photo of their prohibited relationship some kind of heavenly poetic justice.  Some of these people must be Uncle Sol's family, or the happy couple's friends.  Who, we wondered, are the two little girls sitting at the foot of the bride and groom?   Then, today, two women walked up to take the mic while we are telling stories of Auntie Rose's life.  These two women, in their 90s, announced themselves to be the flower girl and ring bearer at Auntie Rose's wedding.  Mystery solved.

Auntie Rose is a woman with an interesting life.  She was born in Biale, Poland and traveled as a preteen with her younger sister Ruth (my grandmother) and their mother (my "bubbu Lesky") to the United States to be with my great-grandfather, Ben, or Zayda, as my mother called him.  I never knew Zayda because he died six weeks before I was born.  In fact, I was named for him.  Zayde preceded his family from Poland by eight years. As a young girl, Rose trailed her father around his business whenever he allowed it.  As a young woman she followed in her father's entrepreneurial footsteps.  After she married her handsome prince, my Uncle Sol - an ambitious tailor - she did the unheard of thing for a woman of those times - she opened a business.  She secured a loan with the help of Uncle Sol, and built a fabric store. 

Somewhere along the lines, Auntie Rose and Uncle Sol finagled a house in a development with covenants prohibiting Jewish residents by convincing a non-Jewish builder friend to buy the lot, build the house and sell it to them. 

Why, I once asked her, did you even want to be in a development full of people who didn't want to be around Jews? 

"Honey" (HAH nee), she answered me in her sweet, patient, little bit shakey voice, "why - how could they KNOW they didn't want to be around us until they had a chance to meet us?"  She knew she'd win those gentiles over, and she did.

Although my Uncle Sol eventually bought the mens furnishings factory where he got his first job, he never stopped tailoring, and was the tailor to President Truman, before and during his time in the White House.  The famous quote from Uncle Sol about Harry Truman, from an interview with a Truman Library historian, is this:

"I’ll tell you, my experience with Mr. Truman . . . In fact, I told him one time, that only in the United States could this happen—I’m Jewish—and only in America could a Jewish boy from Poland grow up to make clothes for the President of the United States. This could never happen in any other country especially in Europe. And he says, “In the United States, everything can happen. I was a farm boy and I became president. Anything can happen.”"

Auntie Rose's home has always been adorned with pictures of Uncle Sol standing with famous political figures of the era, for some of whom he tailored suits.  Auntie Rose traveled extensively with Uncle Sol, for both business and pleasure.  I'm not entirely sure who cared for their daughters (my first cousins once removed) Shirley and Laurel while they traveled, although it's highly likely that certain summer escapades that were the stories of my youth happened at my great-grandparents' country farm while their parents were away.

Auntie Rose has weathered a lot of storms too.  She apparently has the genetics of the energizer bunny.  She has miraculously survived multiple by-pass surgeries, lived through the gut-wrenching sadness of losing her oldest daughter Shirley (mother of Sam, Ethan and Howard) to cancer, and the natural death of her beloved Sol.  I think what keeps her ticking, quite frankly, is the way she collects and surrounds herself with friends, and also the way she recalls her life. 

As for her friend collection, everyone she's taken an interest in feels they have received something substantial from the relationship.  Even in the short time she's been a resident of Shalom Geriatrics, she's already become the belle of the ball.  One of the speakers today, a man who exercises with her in the indoor pool and has apparently not lost his eye for beautiful women in swimming attire, noted, "She's still hot."  Howard, emceeing, put the mic to Auntie Rose after this statement.

"Boiling," she retorted.

And... well... a lot of how she remembers her life is not exactly as it really happened.  But she puts the best dress on it from her vantage, and although it occasionally irritates those who were also there and remember it differently, her stories sustain her. 

# # #

Sleep, in my parents' sitting room, has been particularly hard to come by.  Someone wakes in the night and drifts into the kitchen for water.  Someone else gets up early and can't control themselves.  They pick up the end of the blanket draped over my head to shield me from the inconsiderate light coming through floor-to-ceiling windows, just to see if I'm there.  Well, duh.

But it is hard to complain. 

Last night I sat with my brother and cousins at Sam's house, eating kosher fried chicken and whatever else they had left over from the night before's Shabbat dinner, catching up on the plans and dreams of these wonderful people with whom I have a forever bond.  Listening with amusement or awe or pure pleasure to the younger generation of our family, coming up behind us and beginning to make lives of their own. 

I so wished my daughters were there.  I so wanted them to meet their cousins, see that these people they barely know because they did not grow up in the same community are nevertheless so much like them.  The genetic pool or maybe it's the values pool is such an amazing thing.  We speak the same language, we communicate so easily, we understand each other as though we share a skin.  We joke, we support, we agree, we suggest.  The conversation ranges from technology to ethics to newly begotten drivers' licenses to photography to politics.  The laughter flows like wine.

There are others who could not join us, and their absence is particularly felt.  Aunt Betty and Uncle Lou have one child, Jody, living in town.  We feel the absence of their other three terribly.  I wish my brother Jon was here, but he stayed home tonight.  We brought my niece Nina to represent his clan.  She is upstairs doing who knows what with Imerie.  This makes me smile.  We keep her out way too late.

The silly term, "these are my peeps" suddenly takes on the proportions of the Exodus from Egypt.  I would go anywhere, do anything, for these people.  Cousins. 

And in fact, we decide to strengthen the bonds.  To explore a reprint of the family cookbook.  We talk about taking the wonderful family tree work done by my Uncle Lou and cousin Lolly and put it "in the cloud" so that we can all contribute to it.  We talk about gathering stories so that the begat chart can be fleshed out while there are still those who remember.  We speak of visiting the family who isn't here.  About finding the family we haven't really met.  About traveling one and all to far-away places to look for lost relatives.  A sense of sudden urgency overcomes us.  It's getting late. Our parents are getting old or gone.  For the most part, our grandparents are gone.  Why are we just now having these conversations?  It suddenly seems like time is sliding out from under us and we are just beginning to appreciate the enormity of what we have.

I so badly wish my daughters were here too.   

I have some guilt about not bringing my children up in the vicinity of their cousins.  I don't think they will ever have what those of us who grew up together in Kansas City have.  But, maybe if we put our family up in the cloud, connections and reconnections will happen.  Facebook has already instigated a bit of this.  Maybe Lisa and Shai will discover each other's writing.  Maybe Jessica, Natalie, Ari, Jody and Lisa, sisters and cousins of relatively the same ages living on two different continents, will somehow connect, with God's help.  Maybe if all the parents and grandparents already up there can sway with the Universe just a little bit. 

After the first party this morning, just the family - meaning probably 40 or 50 of us - retire to Laurel & Mike's home for real food and familiness.  Laurel has pulled together both parties and can't seem to get enough of us.  We oblige her by eating her out of house and home, and taking photos of every configuration of family grouping we can think of, officially and methodically in the library with Auntie Rose, and haphazardly on the staircase, grabbing whomever is passing by.

Already the pictures are beginning to find their way to facebook.  Cousins who could not make it are "liking" what they see, and joining belatedly in the celebration.  People are promising to make it to Israel, Vegas, Phoenix, Australia.  Talking about traveling together as cousins.  It feels very, very cool. 

Being joyous together is different from the reunions we've had around funerals.  Not a funeral this, but a simcha, a celebration.  A bit of a heart-felt knock off below.

"God would like us to be joyful even when our hearts lie panting on the floor. 
How much more can we be joyful when there's really something to be joyful for?

To us and our good fortune.  Be happy! Be healthy!  Long life!
May all our futures be pleasant ones, just like the present one,

Drink l'chaim!
To LIFE!"

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Tell Me What You Really Think!

Do you wanna know a secret?  Ooh ah ooh.  Do you promise not to tell?  Ooh ah ooh.  Wo-o-oalk closer.  Let me whisper in your ear.  Ooh ah oooh.  All the words I long to he-e-ear.  I'm in love with you.  Oooh ooh ooh ooh.  Oooh ooh ooh ooh.

I was reading an article about "social proof," the term that denotes a measure of peer approval for an idea.  The article contended that we're all influenced by the knowledge that a lot of our "friends" like something.  In fact, if many friends like it and we haven't tried it, we're likely to think we're being left behind! 

While as a generic thing, it's undoubtedly true that we are influenced by friends' opinions, the article was specifically talking about the little "like" icon that shows up next to all kinds of things these days. 


You know, I admit to being influenced when a foodie friend lets me know she had a really good meal at a new restaurant.  I admit to being influenced when certain friends tell me they loved a new best selling novel.  But... there's nothing about an anonymous tip that gets me going. 

Part of the friend-influence factor is who the friend is, and my level of respect for their expertise in the thing "liked."  Back to my foodie friends: I am more likely to be interested in their take on restaurants.  But say a date wants to take me to their mother's favorite restaurant - and it happened that way not long ago - I am suspect.  I know my eating habits are not even remotely like most of my own generation, let alone my parents' generation.  Or, if someone is a conservative, I'm highly unlikely to agree with her opinion of a policy article.  Or, since I'm a health food nut, I'm unlikely to be swayed by the number of "likes" next to a Frito Lays advertisement.

In other words, I think the bean counters are missing the boat.  I don't really care how many people click the little "like" button.  What I do care about is whether people I deem to be in the know think something is hot, hot, hot! 

It's not how many friends have an opinion.  It's the right friends that makes you smart.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

scaramouch, scaramouch, will you do the fandango?


Oh Sarah Palin. How can I ever thank you?


Yesterday people were gigging you again for another Palinism, "squirmish." I didn't see the original context, so I don't know whether you were after "skirmish" or "squirm."

I wanted to check the spelling of "skirmish," which led me to the dictionary.  Imagine my surprise when I read there the origins of the word:

Origin:
1300–50; (noun) Middle English skirmysshe  < Old French eskirmiss-,  long stem of eskirmir  < Germanic (compare Old High German skirman ); replacing Middle English scarmouche  < Old French escaramoucher  ( see Scaramouch); (v.) late Middle English scarmuchen, scarmusshen  to skirmish, Middle English skirmisshen  to brandish a weapon < Old French escar ( a ) mucher  to skirmish; vowels influenced by Old French eskirmiss- http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/skirmish

There it was.  Scaramouch.

Be honest, dear reader.  How many times have you sung along with Queen, "Scaramouch, scaramouch, will you do the fandango?" and asked yourself, "what IS that nonsense I'm singing?"

Well, lo and behold, it is not nonsense.  Scaramouch is from the French, as you can see above, and means to skirmish - yes I know you're not supposed to use a word in its definition, so "skirmish" means a hand-to-hand combat.
 

So, following the stream of consciousness that passes for my brain, of course next I look up the lyrics to Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody to see what the fandango - isn't that a dance??? - has to do with military skirmish.  

Absolutely nothing.

So it turns out that Scaramouch is also the name of the hero in an historical novel of the same name, by Rafael Sabatini.  In the novel, Scaramouch is a "swashbuckling character" who goes incognito.  Perhaps his name is Scaramouch because "swashbuckling" sounds a little like something one does during hand-to-hand combat.   All right.  Hold on.  I will look up "swashbuckling."

Oh, for crying out loud.

–adjective
1.
characteristic of or behaving in the manner of a swashbuckler.

Apparently even http://www.dictionary.com/ doesn't know it's against the rules to use the term itself in the definition.  Let's try Merriam Webster.

swash·buck·ler

noun \-ˌbə-klər\

1: a swaggering or daring soldier or adventurer

Better.  Now, back to Queen.  According to Wikipedia, for whatever that's worth, Queen was inspired by Rafael Sabatini's character and thus put a scaramouche into their song Bohemian Rhapsody:

I see a little silhouetto of a man
Scaramouche, Scaramouche, will you do the
fandango?
Thunderbolt and lightning, very very frightening me ...
And if you're not now singing, "Galileo, Galileo," then your mind works far differently than mine!

By the way, you've simply got to love the people who make Wikipedia their life's work.  There is an ENTIRE entry just on this one song, Bohemian Rhapsody.  And it's a long entry.  Everything you never knew there was to know.  But that's a topic for someone else's blog.  Or, click here if you want to be instantly transported.

So, thank you Sarah Palin.  Look at the adventure I got from your latest gaff.

And, Sarah, seriously - I want you to know I LOVE the word "squirmish" and think we should find a place for it in the dictionary.  It rolls off the tongue really well, and I can think of half-dozen uses. 

I mean, how better to describe a two year old struggling to get out of your arms?  He's squirmish. 

Or a politician struggling to get her foot out of her mouth.  She's squirmish.

Wait.  Maybe that was what you had in mind all along.

Why not collect all your Palinisms into a Palinary?  What an adventure that would be.

...♫... I'm just a poor boy and nobody loves me
He's just a poor boy from a poor family....
♫...